Hammering the Traveller

By | Category: Travel rumblings

Early January means one thing to many travellers. The time of increased rail fares. This year the average increase is 5.8% which is well above the rate of inflation. But that disguises a range of price rises varying from the high to the outrageous for this year train companies can decide which fares go up or not. The government rule is that prices go up by the retail price index plus 1% apart from two lines, Southeastern and West Yorkshire where it is RPI plus 3%.
Passenger Focus, the consumer watchdog covering the railways has pointed out that a Norwich to London anytime return goes up by 14% and Canterbury to London goes by nearly 13%. But Travelmole, the online travel trade e-letter has found that a London monthly fare from Hornsey to Stevenage has gone up by 46.2% from £194.40 to £284.20 which may only be about £90 but is it over £1,000 extra a year to find.
Why should we face inflation leaping prices when many of us won’t receive pay rises this year? It is because of two features say the Association of Train Operating Companies (ATOC). The first is that the government wants the general taxpayer to provide a smaller subsidy so that travellers pay a truer price for their journey and secondly because of a need to invest in new trains and better infrastructure. We’ve heard this poppycock for years and many would question what improvements there have been particularly given the service levels over the recent month due to the snow. What new trains and carriages? What electrification? What improved maintenance rosters so that I still have trains at the weekend? Passenger Focus says that half the people surveyed said that they didn’t consider rail travel as value for money.
To be fair though, when I checked just now, my regular single Leeds to London fare, booked in advance is still the same £30 that it has been for the last couple of months. But not all of us can plan like this.
We are told more people are travelling by train than ever before yet is it because they want to or they have to? Commuters into the major cities have little option having just one train operating company to use. They can use a car but parking, the time it takes to travel a few miles and fuel prices make that an expensive operation. What happened to getting cars of the road and promoting public transport as a green alternative? What happened to cutting down on congestion. Yes these are old arguments, well rehearsed and trotted out over the years but still relevant. There were two fairly lame interviews this morning, one on Sky with Christian Wolmar, the rail expert and the other on BBC Breakfast with Ashwan Kumar of Passenger Focus and Michael Roberts of ATOC which used some of the arguments but provided no new ideas or advice to travellers.
Railways are used for holidays, day trips, short breaks and are an important feature of tourism. Make them unviable and numbers will drop and there will be the clamour to close lines and save money. That leads to revenue and visitor decline in parts of the country where economic regeneration is needed.
So here are some alternative suggestions which may be new but probably aren’t.
1 Every railway franchise area should have at least two train operating companies working the lines. Competition could help
2 If that idea is unacceptable break the day into 24 one hour units and let train companies bid for which hours of the day they want to operate trains in. They cannot be awarded two consecutive hour long periods so that the fares from 7-8am should be different from 8-9am which would allow commuters and travellers to decide which company they travel with.
3 Treat stations like airports. Rail companies bid for slots and if A gets the 8am from Manchester to Newcastle, there would be nothing (other than platform availability) to stop B running an 8.05 on the same route.
4 Nationalise the whole rail network and treat it as infrastructure for economic regeneration and use some of the sums wasted at the old regional development agencies as investment. Market the rail network abroad as a viable linked-up alternative for getting around with more 7 day passes, 14 day passes and books of £10 vouchers which only cost £7.50 each and which could be used to buy tickets.
5 Use underused stations like Bradford Forster Square, Harrogate, Gloucester and Perth so that there can be alternative services like the Cheltenham-Maesteg one
5 Stop buck passing between government and the rail operating companies.

If you enjoyed this post, please consider subscribing to the RSS feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.
Tags: , , ,